Dwa oblicza historii WKP(b) — Władymir Iwanowicz Newski i biblia stalinizmu
Abstrakt
The edition of the Th e History of CPSU(B). Short course— in the press at fi rst, and later in book form – marked the completion of lasting several years process of stalinization
of Soviet historiography, i.e. of inlay of this historiography into Stalinist mode of notions of role, tasks and practical functioning of both history as a discipline and practice of dealing with it, and historians. Existing Russian and Polish works, both fully reveal the origins of the “Short course”, as well as the consequences of its publication, and highlight the features of the Stalinist model of historiography. However, as everyone knows, the Stalinist version of history CPSU(B) was not only the most hypocritical version, but also (for this reason) the least engaging one. Before Stalin’s point of view could take full triumph, people like M.A. Riutin, D.B. Riazanow or V.J. Nevsky had to disappear from Soviet public sphere. Th is text is devoted to selected concepts and works of the latter.
of Soviet historiography, i.e. of inlay of this historiography into Stalinist mode of notions of role, tasks and practical functioning of both history as a discipline and practice of dealing with it, and historians. Existing Russian and Polish works, both fully reveal the origins of the “Short course”, as well as the consequences of its publication, and highlight the features of the Stalinist model of historiography. However, as everyone knows, the Stalinist version of history CPSU(B) was not only the most hypocritical version, but also (for this reason) the least engaging one. Before Stalin’s point of view could take full triumph, people like M.A. Riutin, D.B. Riazanow or V.J. Nevsky had to disappear from Soviet public sphere. Th is text is devoted to selected concepts and works of the latter.
Pełny tekst:
PDFAdministracja Cytowania | Strony czasopism